NSBA
Skip navigation links
SMarT
About SMarT
Problems
Solutions
Retaining teachers
Attracting teachers
Financial resources
Technology education
Science education
SMT education and ethics
Mathematics education
SMT and citizenship
Equal opportunities
SMT and religion
The Math Wars
Legal issues
The "urgency gap"
Involving local business
Working with higher ed.
Advisory committees
Community engagement
Vocational education
The changing economy
College admissions
Integrating SMT
SMT curricula
SMT textbooks
Learning styles
Socio-economic variables
Training teachers
SMT standards
Assessment
No Child Left Behind
Leading organizations
Results of testing
Community involvement
Where do we stand?
Resources
Training
News
Share Experiences
Search SMarT

Supported by
SMarT
SMT education and religion 
 
RELATED INFORMATION

Throughout history, science has had a complicated relationship with religion,
but people are often surprised to learn that the relationship has generally been positive. For example, many scientists, past and present, have found inspiration and support for their research through religion. Nevertheless, religious sensibilities have also, at times, been threatened by scientific and technological advancement, and that that tension can lead to controversies that play out in U.S. public schools.  The best known of these controversies involves the science of evolution, but stem cell research, global warming, and “Christian math” are examples of other SMT issues that have caused religiously-motivated conflict in our public school system. 

These controversies rarely put the interests of students first and they can be financially devastating to school districts, so it is best if they can be prevented.  Sustained public engagement that involves a wide a range of community members will make the politicization of religious controversies less likely. If public engagement is well- established before controversial issues arise, stakeholders are less likely to take sides.  When controversies do arise, it is important to recognize that they touch people’s core values and to address them with sensitivity and respect.  Work with religious leaders in your community, or national groups such as Public Agenda or AAAS’s Program of Dialogue on Science, Ethics, and Religion, to discover common ground and work towards amicable solutions.

  • How can we prevent controversies around SMT education and religion from occurring in our district?
  • How should we respond if controversies arise?
  • How can we reach out to communities that are resistant to aspects of the SMT curriculum?
  • What resources are available to help us prevent or address controversies involving SMT education and religion?
  • What approaches have boards have taken to address religious reservations about SMT education?

How can we prevent controversies around SMT education and religion from occurring in our district?

How should we respond if controversies arise?

How can we reach out to communities that are resistant to aspects of the SMT curriculum?

What resources are available to help us prevent or address controversies involving SMT education and religion?

See

What approaches have boards have taken to address religious reservations about SMT education?




Copyright © 2010. American Association for the Advancement of Science.
All rights reserved. Read our privacy policy.